Re: [PATCH] ACPI driver support for pata

[Jeff Garzik]

Robert Hancock wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> > - Add a driver for motherboard ACPI method devices
> > - Link it after normal drivers so ACPI is not preferred
> > - Hook the AMD driver to prefer ACPI for the Nvidia devices if ACPI is
> > active
> > - While we are at it fix up the simplex clear the AMD driver.
> >
> > Depends upon the set_mode -> do_set_mode wrapper patch
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I tried out 2.6.21-rc1 with the pata_acpi patch. First off, when you 
> enable pata_acpi, it appears that the Fedora mkinitrd stuff decides that 
> that should be loaded as the first driver. On boot it promptly attempts 
> to attach to all of the ATA controllers, including the nForce SATA 
> controllers, which somehow it fails to actually drive causing a failure 
> to mount the root filesystem. I got around that by blacklisting 
> pata_acpi in /etc/modprobe.conf before installing the kernel and 
> un-blacklisting it afterwards, so it wouldn't make the initrd try and 
> load it, but there must be a better solution.
>
> It does seem to drive the PATA controllers, but the cable detection 
> doesn't seem to be working:
>
> scsi5 : pata_acpi
> ata5.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66
> ata5.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> ata5.00: configured for UDMA/33

Honestly I don't think pata_acpi is the best way to go.

Unless we know /nothing/ about the controller (not true, in sata_nv 
case), I think it would be better to initiate ACPI actions from specific 
drivers, rather than forcing the user to switch from pata_amd to pata_acpi.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/