[PATCH 06/14] x86_64 irq: Simplfiy the set_affinity logic.

[Eric W. Biederman]

For some reason the code has been picking TARGET_CPUS when asked to
set the affinity to an empty set of cpus.  That is just silly it's
extra work.  Instead if there are no cpus to set the affinity to we
should just give up immediately.  That is simpler and a little more
intuitive.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c |   12 +++---------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
index e064838..74671de 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -244,9 +244,7 @@ static void set_ioapic_affinity_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
 
 	cpus_and(tmp, mask, cpu_online_map);
 	if (cpus_empty(tmp))
-		tmp = TARGET_CPUS;
-
-	cpus_and(mask, tmp, CPU_MASK_ALL);
+		return;
 
 	vector = assign_irq_vector(irq, mask, &tmp);
 	if (vector < 0)
@@ -1890,9 +1888,7 @@ static void set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
 
 	cpus_and(tmp, mask, cpu_online_map);
 	if (cpus_empty(tmp))
-		tmp = TARGET_CPUS;
-
-	cpus_and(mask, tmp, CPU_MASK_ALL);
+		return;
 
 	vector = assign_irq_vector(irq, mask, &tmp);
 	if (vector < 0)
@@ -1985,9 +1981,7 @@ static void set_ht_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
 
 	cpus_and(tmp, mask, cpu_online_map);
 	if (cpus_empty(tmp))
-		tmp = TARGET_CPUS;
-
-	cpus_and(mask, tmp, CPU_MASK_ALL);
+		return;
 
 	vector = assign_irq_vector(irq, mask, &tmp);
 	if (vector < 0)
-- 
1.5.0.g53756

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/