Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5

[H. Peter Anvin]

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On 2/26/07, Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Whats the status on this, I was suprised to see something so important
> > just go dead ?
>
> It's not dead. You can find the latest patches here:
>
> http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/penberg/linux/revoke/patches/
>
> and user-space tests here:
>
> http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/penberg/linux/revoke/utils/
>
> What they are lacking is review so I am not sure how to proceed with
> the patches.

On this general subject, would it make sense to, for the future, have 
system calls of the -at() form only, and specify that the f- system 
calls take (fd, NULL) as the (file descriptor, filename) tuple?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/