Re: [PATCH] Make XFS workqueues nonfreezable

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:54:32 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since freezable workqueues are broken in 2.6.21-rc
> (cf. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116855740612755,
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117261312523921&w=2)
> it's better to change the only user of them, which is XFS, to use "normal"
> nonfreezable workqueues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc2.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1829,11 +1829,11 @@ xfs_buf_init(void)
>  	if (!xfs_buf_zone)
>  		goto out_free_trace_buf;
>  
> -	xfslogd_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfslogd");
> +	xfslogd_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfslogd");
>  	if (!xfslogd_workqueue)
>  		goto out_free_buf_zone;
>  
> -	xfsdatad_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfsdatad");
> +	xfsdatad_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfsdatad");
>  	if (!xfsdatad_workqueue)
>  		goto out_destroy_xfslogd_workqueue;
>  

Won't this break suspend+XFS?

If so, and given that nobody seems to be reporting this deadlock, perhaps
we'd be better off leaving things as-is for the while?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/