Re: [PATCH -mm 4/5] Blackfin: patch add blackfin support in smc91xethernet controller driver

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:52:48 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Please always prefer coding in C over coding in cpp.
> 
> Yes, it can be writen as a C function.
> We just follow other implementation in the drivers/net/smc91x.h
> 
> start at line 1156 of
> ---
> #ifndef SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR
> #define SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR(addr)                                          \
>         do {                                                            \
>                 unsigned int __v;                                       \
>                 __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR0_REG );                     \
>                 addr[0] = __v; addr[1] = __v >> 8;                      \
>                 __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR1_REG );                     \
>                 addr[2] = __v; addr[3] = __v >> 8;                      \
>                 __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR2_REG );                     \
>                 addr[4] = __v; addr[5] = __v >> 8;                      \
>         } while (0)
> #endif
> _

Please don't treat ghastly old driver code as a model for new kernel code.

> If you think this is necessary, we may rewrite it in C function.

hm, well, if it's copied and pasted from somewhere else then there is some
merit in leaving it as it is.

It would of course be better to pull it out into a shared header file, avoid the
duplication.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/