Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define FIXED_PORT flag for serial_core

[Russell King]

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:44:24AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:26:30PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:19:51PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Therefore, this patch defines a UPF_FIXED_PORT flag for the uart_port
> > > structure.  If this flag is set when the serial port is configured,
> > > any attempts to alter the port's type, io address, irq or base clock
> > > with setserial are ignored.
> > 
> > I've been wondering about this, and it is questionable whether we
> > should allow any serial port which isn't owned by the legacy platform
> > device (the one called "serial8250", iow by the 8250 driver itself)
> > to have the base addresses and interrupts changed.
> > 
> > IOW, we apply this "fixed port" to any port registered by probe
> > modules external to the 8250 driver itself, such as PCI, PNP, etc.
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me.  But maybe in that case we should invert the
> sense of the flag.  UPF_MOVABLE_PORT or UPF_USER_CONFIGURABLE or
> something.

I was thinking about not even having a flag, but instead checking for
port->dev == &serial8250_isa_devs->dev.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/