Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:31:26AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> we've already had some trouble with nsproxy holding things with
> different lifetimes.  As it happens the solution this time was to put
> the pid namespace where it belongs - not in nsproxy - so maybe moving
> this info into nsproxies will be fine, it just rings a warning bell.

nsproxy seems the best place to me to hang off the resource control
objects (nsproxy->ctlr_data[]). These objects provide information like
resource limit etc required by the resource controllers.

Alternately we could move them to task_struct which would cause unnecessary 
duplication of pointers (and wastage of space).

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/