Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers ontop of nsproxy!

[Paul Jackson]

vatsa wrote:
> I suspect we can make cpusets also work
> on top of this very easily.

I'm skeptical, and kinda worried.

... can you show me the code that does this?

Namespaces are not the same thing as actual resources
(memory, cpu cycles, ...).  Namespaces are fluid mappings;
Resources are scarce commodities.

I'm wagering you'll break either the semantics, and/or the
performance, of cpusets doing this.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/