Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] hard_smp_processor_id overhaul
From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 22:10:37 EST
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 09:06 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0900, Fernando Luis VÃzquez Cao wrote:
> > As a consequence, the hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id() to 0 on UP
> > systems (see "linux/smp.h") is not correct.
> >
> > This patch-set does the following:
> >
> > 1- Remove hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id on UP systems.
>
> NAK. This has to be configurable, as many embedded systems don't even
> have APICs. Please rework the patch set so that there is not any overhead
> for existing UP systems.
In i386 (with the exception of voyager) and x86_64,
hard_smp_processor_id is not used anywhere in the kernel when there are
no APICs available.
Regarding the overhead, hard_smp_processor_id is used mostly during
initialization and doesn't seem to be used in any fast path in i386,
x86_64, and ia64. All the other architectures are not affected by this
patch, because I kept the hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id on UP
kernels, and just moved the definition to asm/smp.h because it should be
handled by architecture-speficic code.
So unless strictly necessary I would not like to make this patches
dependent on kdump.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/