On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:My personal opinion is that while I'm not a huge fan of virtualization,Could you please clarify as to what "that layer" means - is it the
these kinds of things really _can_ be handled more cleanly at that layer,
and not in the kernel at all. Afaik, it's what IBM already does, and has
been doing for a while. There's no shame in looking at what already works,
especially if it's simpler.
firmware/hardware for virtualization? or does it refer to user space?
Virtualization in general. We don't know what it is - in IBM machines it's a hypervisor. With Xen and VMware, it's usually a hypervisor too. With KVM, it's obviously a host Linux kernel/user-process combination.
The point being that in the guests, hotunplug is almost useless (for bigger ranges), and we're much better off just telling the virtualization hosts on a per-page level whether we care about a page or not, than to worry about fragmentation.
And in hosts, we usually don't care EITHER, since it's usually done in a hypervisor.
It would also be useful to have a resource controller like per-container
RSS control (container refers to a task grouping) within the kernel or
non-virtualized environments as well.
.. but this has again no impact on anti-fragmentation.