Re: [patch 0/9] 2.6.19-stable review

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:48:54PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> 
> The dvbdev patch is pretty important, fixes a horrible problem, although the case for
> it to occur is rare.  The other two patches are of the "obviously correct - minimal change" 
> type.
> 
> If it isnt too much trouble, then yes, it is worth it to push a new release because of the
> dvbdev patch.
> 
> However, please chop the "backported from" and "cherry picked from" lines from those patches.
> I cherry-picked them from Mauro's tree, but he wiped it out and re-pushed those changes in
> before Linus merged them....  so, the actual changesets in Linus' tree have different hashes.
> 
> (i removed those old hashes from the patches that I posted on linuxtv.org)

I picked up the new patches and did a new release.

> As for the 2.6.20.y patches, should I email those to you inline or can you just grab them from
> the linuxtv.org www server?  ( http://linuxtv.org/~mkrufky/stable/2.6.20.y/ )

Email is usually better, as that's what my scripts are set up to handle.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/