Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
From: Anton Altaparmakov
Date: Sun Mar 04 2007 - 15:12:10 EST
On 3 Mar 2007, at 22:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 02 March 2007 00:38:19 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Forgive me if I haven't put enough thought into it, but would it be
useful to create a generic_fallocate() that writes zeroed pages
for any
non-existent pages in the range? I don't know how glibc currently
implements posix_fallocate(), but maybe the kernel could do it more
efficiently, even in generic code. Maybe we don't care, since
the major
file systems can probably do something better in their own code.
I'd be more happy to have the write out zeroes loop in glibc. And
glibc needs to have it anyway, for older kernels.
A generic_fallocate makes sense to me iff we can do it in the kernel
more significantly more efficiently than in glibc, e.g. by using only
a single page in page cache instead of one for each page to be
preallocated.
If glibc is smart enough to do an optimal implementation, I fully
agree
with you.
glibc cannot ever be smart enough because a file system driver will
always know better and be able to do things in a much more optimized
way.
For example on NTFS fallocate() only needs to involve the setting of
a few bits in the volume block allocation bitmap (one bit for each
logical block being allocated) and update the extent map in the on-
disk inode to reflect that those blocks are now allocated to the
inode. Then it just needs to update the allocated size and
optionally the data size (if fallocate wants to increase the file
size rather than just the allocated size). And that is it. No
zeroing needs to happen at all because we have not updated the
initialized size of the inode!
glibc can only dream of an implementation like this. (-;
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/