On 05/03/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >also below is a softlockup-debug patch that might be useful, which adds
> > >a tick/tock output so it spams the console once per second but can show
> > >the dynamics of lockups (and other delays).
> >
> > I have applied this patch
> > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc2-git3-kdump/log3.txt
>
> thanks. It seems that the 'BUG: soft lockup detected' message does not
> occur in this log though - and that there are bootup messages between
> the two sysrq outputs:
>
> [ 221.101833] skge eth1: disabling interface
> [ 228.740911] audit(1173094442.943:11): user pid=3245 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 msg='changing system
> time: exe="/sbin/hwclock"
> (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=console res=success)'
> [ 233.148571] md: md1 in immediate safe mode
>
> plus there's trouble with irq 10:
>
> [ 132.013194] irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 132.072771] Disabling IRQ #10
>
> that prompted you to enable irqpoll, right?
No. irqpoll is added by /etc/init.d/kdump script (FC6).
> So am i right that without
> irqpoll there's no lockup?
I will check this.