[PATCH 09/11] uml: fix confusion irq early reenabling

[Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso]

From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>

Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and plain
wrong, my fault.

Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/um/drivers/line.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index 01d4ab6..f75d7b0 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
 	struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
 	int err;
 
-	/* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
+	/* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
 	 * IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
+	spin_lock(&line->lock);
 	err = flush_buffer(line);
 	if (err == 0) {
 		return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
 		line->head = line->buffer;
 		line->tail = line->buffer;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
+	spin_unlock(&line->lock);
 
 	if(tty == NULL)
 		return IRQ_NONE;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/