Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> groups like Memory, Disk Space, Sockets might make
> sense though, although we never had a single request
> for any overlapping in the resource management (while
> we have quite a few users of overlapping Network spaces)

If we have to provide this flexibilty of different groupings for
different resources, then I dont see how we can get to the limit with
less than 3 dereferences (unless we bloat the task_struct to point to
the various limit structures directly).

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/