Re: Problem with freezable workqueues

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:30, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > For 2.6.21-rc1 I've invented the appended workaround (works for me, waiting for
> > Johannes to confirm it works for him too), but I think we need something better
> > for -mm and future kernels.
> 
> Finally I could get back to this but after reading the thread I figured
> it might not be necessary to test this. Please let me know ASAP if you
> want this patch tested as well or it'll take quite a long time (going
> skiing for a week on Saturday)

I think it won't be necessary.

For now, we have decided to make the workqueues nonfreezable (the patch for
that has already been merged, AFAICT).

> In any case, I made the two xfs workqueues non-freezable and everything
> on my quad powermac works again, I also couldn't detect any filesystem
> correction.

Good, thanks for the confirmation.

> I wanted to adapt the BUG_ON(block IO not from suspend code) 
> patch from suspend2 but haven't gotten around to it yet.

That might be a good idea for other reasons too, but I'd prefer WARN_ON()
instead of BUG_ON() when you're at it. ;-)

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/