Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixesnonlinear)

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:27:55 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> * Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > If it doesn't look very impressive, it could be because it leaves all 
> > the old crud around for backwards compatibility (the worst offenders 
> > are removed in patch 6/6).
> > 
> > If you look at the patchset as a whole, it removes about 250 lines, 
> > mostly of (non trivial) duplicated code in filemap.c memory.c shmem.c 
> > fremap.c, that is nonlinear pages specific and doesn't get anywhere 
> > near the testing that the linear fault path does.
> > 
> > A minimal fix for nonlinear pages would have required changing all 
> > ->populate handlers, which I simply thought was not very productive 
> > considering the testing and coverage issues, and that I was going to 
> > rewrite the nonlinear path anyway.
> > 
> > If you like, you can consider patches 1,2,3 as the fix, and ignore 
> > nonlinear (hey, it doesn't even bother checking truncate_count 
> > today!).
> > 
> > Then 4,5,6 is the fault/nonlinear rewrite, take it or leave it. I 
> > thought you would have liked the patches...
> 
> btw., if we decide that nonlinear isnt worth the continuing maintainance 
> pain, we could internally implement/emulate sys_remap_file_pages() via a 
> call to mremap() and essentially deprecate it, without breaking the ABI 
> - and remove all the nonlinear code. (This would split fremap areas into 
> separate vmas)
> 

I'm rather regretting having merged it - I don't think it has been used for
much.

Paolo's UML speedup patches might use nonlinear though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/