Re: [PATCH] remove_arg_zero() rewrite

[Randy Dunlap]

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:55:12 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:09:57 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I mean.... what the hell?
> > > > 
> > > > As you appear to have managed to work out what the sorry thing is trying to
> > > > do, would you have time to simply rip it out and completely rewrite it,
> > > > including a nice comment telling the world what this function's function is?
> > > > 
> > > > Because what we have there is beyond repairing.
> > > 
> > > Something like so?
> > > Boots uml seemingly without errors.
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > Rewrite remove_arg_zero() to be more parseable by untwisted minds.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, Nick already had a go at this:
> 
> Darn, must've fell off of lkml... or I missed it catching up my 4000+
> email backlog.

Hm, I've had a similar issue.  Mail problems or what...

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/