Re: Kernel threads

[Andrew Morton]

> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:03:48 -0500 "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In linux-2.6.16.24, there is a problem with kernel threads
> and the aic79xx.c driver.
> 
> When nash is executing /initrd/linuxrc in the initial RAM disk
> during boot, it will be installing drivers. One driver, aic79xx.c
> creates some kernel threads that will exit after the initialization
> procedure. Actually the number of tasks depends upon the number
> of disks found as the driver spawns these tasks so initialization
> can occur in the background. The kernel tasks have been 'parented'
> to init. This may be fine for the real init, but nash and other
> shells receive the SIGCHLD signal and think that the fork()/exec()
> they have executed is complete. This makes nash insert drivers
> when the needed previous ones have not yet initialized. Also, when
> booting a shell, the signals from the exiting kernel tasks confuse
> it.
> 
> I think the top-level thread, kthread, should be reaping children
> instead of init, which in some cases isn't even running yet.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> The current work-around of putting `sleep 10` in linuxrc after
> installing each driver is a hack of the worse kind. Especially,
> considering an Adaptec controller with many drives attached may
> require 'sleep 60'!
> 

ug.  I've always disliked the kernel's dependence upon init to reap exitted
kernel threads.  It Just Seems Wrong.

But I'd have thought that this is really wart in nash - Linux simply
expects init to reap dead kernel threads, and as a Linux implementation of
init, nash ought to not misbehave in the presence of this logstanding
kernel behaviour.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/