Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
From: Chris Wright
Date: Thu Mar 08 2007 - 14:01:56 EST
* Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> >
> > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> > no-go.
>
> You're going to have to justify this assertion.
> I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
> LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
> claims of SELinux.
Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA
as LSM because it was not doing access control,
rather integrity measurements. It's all in
somewhere the archives.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/