Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n'

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:37:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:44, Dave Jiang wrote:
> 
> > In spite of kgdb, shouldn't it have that \n anyways in case some other code
> > gets added in the future after the macro? Or are you saying that there should
> > never be any code ever after that macro?
> 
> Sure if there is mainline code added after that macro we add the \n.
> But only if it makes sense to add code there, which it didn't in kgdb.

Was that because with recent enough tools and config options there was
enough annotations so GDB could finally figure out where things had
stopped?  Thanks.

-- 
Tom Rini
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/