Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance,
>> something like:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some
> consensus here :)

It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather
leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it.
I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda
when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)
etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to
consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/