Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Probably tweaking the webpage doesnt help because people dont get 
> > there - as the results plainly show it. Maybe some more automation 
> > would be useful too, a tool that detects failed resume and tries all 
> > those options that makes sense on that box or something? It's not 
> > like that
> 
> Unfortunately, these tend to crash the box when you pass wrong 
> options, and I do not see easy way to test "can user see whats on 
> display" automatically.

you could perhaps try what X's modesetting utility does: display a 
dialog box that times out if it does not get clicked on, and reboot if 
it did not get clicked on. Likewise, detect upon the next bootup that a 
suspend-test was in progress (and didnt get back via normal resume), via 
some temporary file. That way both the 'did not resume and i had to 
power-cycle' and the 'resume did not restore my X' problems can be 
handled.

Finally, when the correct options have been established (worse-case with 
a small number of reboots and "yes, indeed the resume did not work fine" 
clicks done upon bootup by the user), automatically fill in a webform in 
firefox and ask the user to do a single click to submit that form.

techniques like that have more chance i think to get Linux 
suspend/resume anywhere near to working. The current 'rely on the 
developer' technique apparently does not work.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/