Re: [PATCH] MMC: Clean up low voltage range handling

[Philip Langdale]

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> 
> We must not have the same specs. My simplified SD 2.0 physical spec
> defines everything below bit 15 as reserved.

I was a little unclear. Both specs define bit 7 as the low-voltage
range but only the MMC spec defines the actual voltage. As such, there
is no complete definition of a low voltage SD card. That's why I added
the sanity check in the actual code.

> Although this is a nice change, it confuses things to have two changes
> in one commit. Could you split them up and base it on my "for-andrew"
> branch?

Yeah, I thought you'd think that :-) I'll post the two diffs shortly.

Thanks,

--phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/