Re: [patch] change futex_wait() to hrtimers

[Andi Kleen]

> if HIGH_RES_TIMERS is disabled then that is what happens. But frankly, 

disabled? I would expect it (= more wakeups) when hrtimers are enabled.

> most futex waits are without timeouts - if an application cares about 
> micro-effects like that then you are much better off not using a 
> per-futex timeout anywa

That sounds like you're arguing for not using hrtimers here because
the applications shouldn't depend on precise timeouts here anyways?!? 

Anyways when you convert more kernel timeouts to hrtimers you should
probably add some kind of batching facility that can be globally
configured with a sysctl or similar. Then at least laptops (and possibly
servers) can opt for more power saving again. For the futexes alone
it probably won't matter too much agreed, but I see a trend to more hr.

I also liked the idea (stolen from another popular OS) that a application
can tell the OS how precise it wants its wakeups to be.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/