Re: [discuss] [PATCH 4/4 TRY#3] optimize and simplify get_cycles_sync()

[Andi Kleen]

On Monday 12 March 2007 14:02, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > >From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >This patch simplifies the get_cycles_sync() function by removing
> > >the #ifdefs from it. Further it introduces an optimization for AMD
> > >processors. There the RDTSCP instruction is used instead of CPUID;RDTSC
> > >which is helpfull if the kernel runs as a KVM guest. Running as a guest
> > >makes CPUID very expensive because it causes an intercept of the guest.
> > >
> > >  +#define RDTSCP ".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xf9"
> > >+	alternative_io_two("cpuid\nrdtsc",
> > >+			   "rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC,
> > >+			   ".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xf9", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP,
> > >  
> > 
> > why not use the RDTSCP macro here?
> 
> Does this macro exist? I couldn't found it in the current git tree. And
> the rdtscp macros in msr.h use the plain opcode too.

It doesn't exist. The rdtscp macros are also not used currently, that
is why nobody's binutils complained.

Doing the .bytes is ok

I still don't like the alternative() record complications though.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/