Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 11:01:15 EST
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:09:35PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> > 3. This next leads me to think that 'tasks' file in each directory doesnt make
> > sense for containers. In fact it can lend itself to error situations (by
> > administrator/script mistake) when some tasks of a container are in one
> > resource class while others are in a different class.
> >
> > Instead, from a containers pov, it may be usefull to write
> > a 'container id' (if such a thing exists) into the tasks file
> > which will move all the tasks of the container into
> > the new resource class. This is the same requirement we
> > discussed long back of moving all threads of a process into new
> > resource class.
>
> I think you need to give a more concrete example and use case of what
> you're trying to propose here. I don't really see what advantage
> you're getting.
Ok, this is what I had in mind:
mount -t container -o ns /dev/namespace
mount -t container -o cpu /dev/cpu
Lets we have the namespaces/resource-groups created as under:
/dev/namespace
|-- prof
| |- tasks <- (T1, T2)
| |- container_id <- 1 (doesnt exist today perhaps)
|
|-- student
| |- tasks <- (T3, T4)
| |- container_id <- 2 (doesnt exist today perhaps)
/dev/cpu
|-- prof
| |-- tasks
| |-- cpu_limit (40%)
|
|-- student
| |-- tasks
| |-- cpu_limit (20%)
|
|
Is it possible to create the above structure in container patches?
/me thinks so.
If so, then accidentally someone can do this:
echo T1 > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks
echo T2 > /dev/cpu/student/tasks
with the result that tasks of the same container are now in different
resource classes.
Thats why in case of containers I felt we shldnt allow individual tasks
to be cat'ed to tasks file.
Or rather, it may be nice to say :
echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks
and have all tasks belonging to container id 2 move to the new resource
group.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/