Re: [PATCH] usb-serial regression (Oops) in 2.6.21-rc*
From: Jim Radford
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 18:53:02 EST
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:33:31PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:22:22PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >>Mark Lord wrote:
> > >>>Okay, from that part (above), the problem is obvious:
> > >>>in that the "MCT U232 converter now disconnected" appears,
> > >>>and then we continue to try and call the driver's method.. Oops!
> > >IMHO shutdown() is using serial->port[] and bombs.
> > >Could you reverse the order here?
> > Yup. Fixed. Tested. Works.
> > This patch fixes the Oops that otherwise occurs whenever
> > a USB serial adapter is unplugged from a system, as well
> > the Oops seen when one is in use before resume (to RAM).
> Argh, no, this change was done to help the ftdi drivers out.
> Look at changeset d9a7ecacac5f8274d2afce09aadcf37bdb42b93a in Linus's
> tree from Jim Radford:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d9a7ecacac5f8274d2afce09aadcf37bdb42b93a
>
> It makes this change because the usb-serial drivers need the port
> devices when the port_remove() callbacks happen. Otherwise you get an
> oops that way.
> Jim, can you take a look at this and see if you can figure something
> out?
The problem is really the
serial->port[i] = NULL;
line after device_unregister() which is used to flag "fake" devices
that don't need legacy cleanup later in the destrol_serial. That
flagging should be done using a *real* flag, and not by overloading
the ->port[i] pointer since we require it to be non-NULL in
->shutdown() in all drivers that are not converted to new
->port_probe()/->port_remove() framework (currently all except ftdi).
I'll work on a patch to do that, but for now, I think you should apply
Mark's patch to revert the order change since the FTDI driver no
longer requires the correct ordering of device_unregister() and
->shutdown().
-Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/