[PATCH] Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Tue Mar 13 2007 - 02:40:53 EST
GCC (4.1 at least) unrolls it anyway, but I can't believe this code
was ever justifiable. (I've also submitted a patch which cleans up
i386, which is even uglier).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff -r de5618b5e562 include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h Tue Mar 13 11:41:55 2007 +1100
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h Tue Mar 13 16:09:56 2007 +1100
@@ -135,16 +135,13 @@ static inline void set_ldt_desc(unsigned
(info)->useable == 0 && \
(info)->lm == 0)
-#if TLS_SIZE != 24
-# error update this code.
-#endif
-
static inline void load_TLS(struct thread_struct *t, unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned int i;
u64 *gdt = (u64 *)(cpu_gdt(cpu) + GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN);
- gdt[0] = t->tls_array[0];
- gdt[1] = t->tls_array[1];
- gdt[2] = t->tls_array[2];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES; i++)
+ gdt[i] = t->tls_array[i];
}
/*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/