Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

[Herbert Poetzl]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:25:48PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > why? you simply enter that specific space and
> > use the existing mechanisms (netlink, proc, whatever)
> > to retrieve the information with _existing_ tools,
> 
> That's assuming that you're using network namespace virtualization,

or isolation :)

> with each group of tasks in a separate namespace. 

correct ...

> What if you don't want the virtualization overhead, just the
> accounting?

there should be no 'virtualization' overhead, and what
do you want to account for, if not by a group of tasks?

maybe I'm missing the grouping condition here, but I
assume you assign tasks to the accounting containers

note: network isolation is not supposed to add overhead
compared to the host system (at least not measureable
overhead)

best,
Herbert

> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/