Re: [PATCH] Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:39:36PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>   
>> GCC (4.1 at least) unrolls it anyway, but I can't believe this code
>>     
>
> Are you sure? Normally it doesn't unroll without -funroll-loops which
> the kernel does normally not set. Especially not with -Os builds.
>   

Does it matter either way in this case?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/