Re: [PATCH 1/2] avoid OPEN_MAX in SCM_MAX_FD

[Roland McGrath]

> > -#define SCM_MAX_FD	(OPEN_MAX-1)
> > +#define SCM_MAX_FD	(NR_OPEN-1)
> 
> This is a bad idea.  [...]

Ok.  My only agenda is to get rid of OPEN_MAX.
I then propose the following instead.


Thanks,
Roland

---
[PATCH] avoid OPEN_MAX in SCM_MAX_FD

The OPEN_MAX constant is an arbitrary number with no useful relation to
anything.  Nothing should be using it.  SCM_MAX_FD is just an arbitrary
constant and it should be clear that its value is chosen in net/scm.h
and not actually derived from anything else meaningful in the system.

Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/scm.h |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
index 5637d5e..2240690 100644  
--- a/include/net/scm.h
+++ b/include/net/scm.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 /* Well, we should have at least one descriptor open
  * to accept passed FDs 8)
  */
-#define SCM_MAX_FD	(OPEN_MAX-1)
+#define SCM_MAX_FD	255
 
 struct scm_fp_list
 {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/