Re: Stolen and degraded time and schedulers
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Wed Mar 14 2007 - 17:17:05 EST
Daniel Walker wrote:
> For interactive tasks (basic scheduling) the execution time, and sleep
> time need to be measured.
Sleep time is interesting. It doesn't make much sense to talk about
time that was stolen while a process was sleeping (it was either stolen
from another running process, or the VCPU was just plain idle). Also,
the definition of sched_clock I'm talking about is inherently per-cpu,
and sleeping has nothing to do with any cpu by definition.
So something other than sched_clock should be used to measure sleep
time, but it needs to produce interval measurements which are in the
same units as sched_clock.
> It's also used for some posix cpu timers
> (sched_ns) , and it used for migration thread initialization.
sched_ns doesn't use it directly except for the case where the process
is currently running. Anyway, it's compatible with what I'm talking about.
> I'm sure
> it's used for a variety of out-of-tree random timing as well..
>
Yeah, well...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/