Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQstorm and rogue DMA access

[Jeff Garzik]

Russell King wrote:
> In any case, relying on such a new control bit to implement this kind
> of functionality would result in a very hit and miss result; Linux

How does Tejun's patch or thesis rely on this new control bit?  He 
explicitly mentions DISABLE_INTX variability...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/