Re: [PATCH 2/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags

[Andrew Morton]

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:19:20 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> +int create_basic_memory_bitmaps(void)
> +{
> +	struct memory_bitmap *bm1, *bm2;
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(forbidden_pages_map || free_pages_map);
> +
> +	bm1 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct memory_bitmap), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	if (!bm1)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	error = memory_bm_create(bm1, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_COLD, PG_ANY);
> +	if (error)
> +		goto Free_first_object;
> +
> +	bm2 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct memory_bitmap), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	if (!bm2)
> +		goto Free_first_bitmap;
> +
> +	error = memory_bm_create(bm2, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_COLD, PG_ANY);
> +	if (error)

What is the risk that we'll go OOM here?  GFP_ATOMIC is rather unreliable.

And why _does_ suspend use GFP_ATOMIC all over the place?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/