Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit

[Randy Dunlap]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:03 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:

> 
> There's way too much code here to expect it to get decently reviewed, alas.

Yes.

/me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml.  :(

> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:20:24 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +/**
> > + * leb_get_ver - get logical eraseblock version.
> > + *
> > + * @ubi: the UBI device description object
> > + * @vol_id: the volume ID
> > + * @lnum: the logical eraseblock number
> > + *
> > + * The logical eraseblock has to be locked. Note, all this leb_ver stuff is
> > + * obsolete and will be removed eventually. FIXME: to be removed together with
> > + * leb_ver support.
> > + */

Please use kernel-doc syntax and test it.  Using and testing it
are really easy to do.  It's just a simple language.  Don't make
(even trivial) problems for others to clean up...

Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt

Above:  no "blank" line between the function name and its parameters.

> > +static inline int leb_get_ver(struct ubi_info *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum)
> > +{
> > +	int idx, leb_ver;
> > +
> > +	idx = vol_id2idx(ubi, vol_id);
> > +
> > +	spin_lock(&ubi->eba.eba_tbl_lock);
> > +	ubi_assert(ubi->eba.eba_tbl[idx].recs);
> > +	leb_ver = ubi->eba.eba_tbl[idx].recs[lnum].leb_ver;
> > +	spin_unlock(&ubi->eba.eba_tbl_lock);
> > +
> > +	return leb_ver;
> > +}


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/