Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit

[Randy Dunlap]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:29:51 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:24:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:03 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > There's way too much code here to expect it to get decently reviewed, alas.
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml.  :(
> 
> Just curious, but where would you suggest this be sent to for review then?

Valid question.  I should have chosen some other more appropriate
patch to make that comment.

I don't see a better list for UBI patches, so lkml is OK IMO.


Here is a summary of my thinking on Linux-related mailing lists.

1.  Bug reports can go to lkml or focused mailing lists.

2.  Development (like patches) should go to focused mailing lists
if there is such a list and they have enough usage.

Development areas that qualify for this IMO are:
- ACPI
- ATA
- file systems
- frame buffer
- ieee1394
- MM/VM
- multimedia
- networking
- PCI
- power management, suspend/resume
- SCSI
- sound
- USB
- virtualization


(not that I expect anything close to concensus on this)
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/