Re: [patch 03/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: use paravirt_nop to consistently mark no-op operations

[Chris Wright]

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > but only as a cleanup of the current open-coded (void *) casts. My 
> > problem with this is that it loses the types. Not that there is much to 
> > check for, but still, this adds some assumptions about how function 
> > calls look like.
> 
> I agree.  I don't generally like this kind of hack, but having a single
> test for "func == paravirt_nop" to look for nop pv_ops in the patcher is
> what tipped the balance.

how about __paravirt_nop_start < func < __paravirt_nop_end  and preserve
the types?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/