Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31

[Bill Davidsen]

Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> >
> > > I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
> > > (communication with the app they're doing IO for) and then expiring.
> > > That's why splitting IO from an app isn't exactly smart. It should at
> > > least be ran in an another thread.
> > Hm.  Sounds rather a lot like the...
> > X sucks, fix X and RSDL will rock your world.  RSDL is perfect.
> > ...that I've been getting.
> not really, only X sucks. KDE works atleast as good with rsdl as
> vanilla. i dont know how originally said kde works worse, wasnt it just
> someone that thought?
It was probably me, and I had the opinion that KDE is not as smooth as 
GNOME with RSDL. I haven't had time to measure, but using for daily 
stuff for about an hour each way hasn't changed my opinion. Every once 
in a while KDE will KLUNK to a halt for 200-300ms doing mundane stuff 
like redrawing a page, scrolling, etc. I don't see it with GNOME.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/