Re: [patch -mm 1/2] i386: add ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young}

[Zachary Amsden]

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>   
> > If you actually clear the bit, you need to:
> >
> > +         pte_update_defer(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
> >
> > The reason is, when updating PTEs, the hypervisor must be notified.  Using
> > atomic operations to do this is fine for all hypervisors I am aware of.
> > However, for hypervisors which shadow page tables, if these PTE modifications
> > are not trapped, you need a post-modification call to fulfill the update of
> > the shadow page table.
> >     
>
> Thanks for the very rapid response.
>
> So, David just needs to move the pte_update_defer out of
> ptep_clear_flush_* and into ptep_test_and_clear_*?
>   

Yes.

> That leaves me wondering why you deleted ptep_test_and_clear_*
> (while leaving their __HAVE_ARCHes) in the first place?
>   

Because raw use of them in the arch independent MM code would introduce 
exactly this bug on i386, so leaving __HAVE_ARCH but leaving out the 
definition would catch this case.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/