Re: [PATCH] Bugfix for VMI paravirt ops

[Zachary Amsden]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>   
> > Yes, thought about several solutions, and this seems the best.  But it
> > requires a new paravirt-op.
> >     
>
> Not with the power of multiplexing.  Something like this, perhaps?
>   

Ok, I tried that and I got a nice clean fix.  For 2.6.22.  Backporting 
this to 2.6.21 creates havoc, as a number of cleanup patches as well as 
changes to highmem code get in the way.

Andi, do you really want to deal with the conflicts this will create for 
the paravirt queue for 2.6.22, or would you rather apply the dumb yet 
simple and non-confrontational workaround I have been trying to get 
applied to 2.6.21?

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/