Re: [PATCH 0/4] i386 - pte update optimizations

[Keir Fraser]

On 13/4/07 03:24, "Zachary Amsden" <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> You do know that P6 and higher don't do locked bus references as long
>> as the value is in the cache, right?
> 
> Yes.  Even then, last time I clocked instructions, xchg was still slower
> than read / write, although I could be misremembering.  And it's not
> totally clear that they will always be in cached state, however, and for
> SMP, we still want to drop the implicit lock in cases where the
> processor might not know they are cached exclusive, but we know there
> are no other racing users.  And there are plenty of old processors out
> there to still make it worthwhile.

LOCKed instruction suck really badly on the netburst microarchitecture (like
factor of 10x, or not far off). I think it's probably because of their side
effect of serialising memory accesses, causing horrible pipeline stalls.

 -- Keir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/