Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

[ian]

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 07:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

> Why? With current battery class we can do whatever everyone needs. No
> need for wrappers.

<cut>

> Because of your original design, simple batteries are stay simple, and
> no noticing that there is some "complicated" attributes exists at all.
> That's indeed great characteristic of that *universal* battery class.

Indeed. Im just trying to make sure we dont bloat an otherwise very
simple class. A word of caution only.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/