On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:29:21 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, correct.The patch adds an __attribute__((aligned(8))) to theBut there might be 32-bit applications out there which are using the
taskstats structure members so that 32 bit applications using taskstats
can work with a 64 bit kernel.
present wrong structure?
otoh, I assume that those applications would be using taskstats.h and would
hence encounter this bug and we would have heard about it, is that correct?
otoh^2, 32-bit applications running under 32-bit kernels will presently beYes, correct. They would be broken with this fix. We could bump up the
functioning correctly, and your change will require that those applications
be recompiled, I think?
version TASKSTATS_VERSION to 4. Would you like a new patch the version
bumped up?
I can do that.
This patch looks like 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 material, but very carefully...Yes, 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 sound correct.
OK. I guess we have little choice but to slam it in asap, with a 2.6.20.x backport
before too many people start using the old interface.