Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm take4 2/6] support multiple logging

[Keiichi KII]

> > We don't really have anything that corresponds to netpoll's
> > connections at higher levels.
> >
> > I'm tempted to say we should make this work more like the dummy
> > network device. ie:
> >
> > modprobe netconsole -o netcon1 [params]
> > modprobe netconsole -o netcon2 [params]
>
> The configuration of netconsole's looks like the configuration of routes.
> Granted you probably have more routes than netconsoles, but the interface
> issues are similar.  Netlink with a small application wouldn't be nice.
> And having /proc/net/netconsole (read-only) would be good for the netlink
> impaired.

Do you say that we had better use procfs instead of sysfs to show the 
configurations of netconsole?

If so, I have a question.
I thought that "procfs use things related to process as far as possible".
Is it no problem to use procfs here? 

--
Keiichi KII
NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center
E-mail: k-keiichi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/