Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

[Chris Friesen]

Rogan Dawes wrote:

> My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with 
> a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually 
> we'll lose them all.

I assume Ingo has set it up so that the system doesn't "lose" partial 
nanoseconds, but rather they'd just be accounted to the wrong task.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/