Re: [PATCH] mm: PageLRU can be non-atomic bit operation
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 04:59:56 EST
> This seems to imply that we need the lock prefix even when updating
> different bits within the same long (not just the same byte). Is this
> interpretation correct?
Yes, that is what I said. The consistency applies to loads/stores
(so e.g. for 128bit SSE2 load/stores too), not bytes.
The current IA32 manuals have a more detailed description of the rules
in volume 3
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/