Re: [RFC][PATCH] on-demand readahead

[Andi Kleen]

> Yeah, the on-demand readahead can avoid _all_ lookups for small in-cache files.

How?

> But what do you mean by AS?

struct address_space

> > You seem to have a lot of magic numbers. They probably all need symbols and 
> > explanations.
> 
> The magic numbers are for easier testings, and will be removed in
> future.  For now, they enables convenient comparing of the two
> algorithms in one kernel.

I mean the 16 and 4 not the sysctl

> 
> If this new algorithm has been further tested and approved, I'll
> re-submit the patch in a cleaner, standalone form. The adaptive
> readahead patches can be dropped then. They may better be reworked as
> a kernel module.

If they actually help and don't cause regressions they shouldn't be a module, 
but integrated eventually Just it has to be all step by step.
> 
> > Your white space also needs some work.
> 
> White space in patch description?

In the code indentation.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/