Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:hang in atomic copy)

[Bill Davidsen]

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > We do not want to fragment the testing base, and suspend2 does not
> > really have any interesting features over uswsusp.
>
> The testing base is already fragmented!
>
> What the current situation means is that you simply never hear from
> the people who get fed up with suspend but who manage to get suspend2
> working.
I have to feel that having a *working resume* capability is "any 
interesting features" enough. What you say about "simply never hear 
from" is unfortunately true.

On 04/25/2007 05:30 PM EDT, Pavel Machek wrote:

>It is not Rafael's fault. Actually it is quite hard to work with
>Nigel, because he implements every feature someone asks for, and wants
>to merge them all  :-( . I don't expect to ever agree with Nigel on
>anything important, sorry.

The fact that Pavel thinks giving the users what they want is a problem 
certainly defines the difference between them, the populist "give them 
what they want" and the elitist "let's them make do with what I think 
they should have."

I do respect Pavel for all the stuff he has done and is doing, I wish I 
could have found a nicer way to say that.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/