Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 21:05:59 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?"
Previous message: WANG Cong: "Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Primarily to let a backup program restore the full state of the filesystem.

Is this wanted? Or needed? I would think there are good reasons why
this hasn't been done so far. Intrusion detection is one reason I can
think of.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?"
Previous message: WANG Cong: "Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] utimensat implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]